Posted by James Eisenstein on 03/22 at 12:10 PM
It’s confession time. I made a small mistake, so uncharacteristic of me, as I’m sure you will agree. You see, in Part 3 of my series “Why Organic?” I wanted to talk about how pesticides are bad for our health and the environment, and then do the same for GMOs.
I intended to make a few, short, simple points about the health effects of pesticides—like they aren’t good for us (especially children) and they aren’t adequately tested and regulated.
My mistake? I decided to do a little Google research for the health effects paragraph, anticipating my inquiring readers’ insistent demands for “evidence.” The more I found out, the clearer it became that just one paragraph wouldn’t do.
Let’s begin by naively assuming that current EPA regulation insures that its established limits for residue from each of its approved pesticides are indeed “safe.” I found a 1989 National Research Council publication titled “Diet and Health” that, while generally raising no alarms about bad health effects from pesticide residue, nonetheless noted that “any assessment of the health effects of exposure to pesticide residues must take into account the potential synergistic interactions and the limited nature of toxicity data on several compounds.” [Interesting side note: This study does not mention organic food even once!]
There are about 875 EPA registered pesticides, and a total of a billion pounds of them are applied each year. When you eat, you can’t ingest just one.
As Penn State biology major John Kepner, project director at Beyond Pesticides, notes, “Pesticide exposures in the real world are not isolated incidents. Rather, they are a string of incidents marked by combinations of exposures. As a result, scientists have argued for years that toxic exposures to pesticides should be measured as they would normally occur, in combination with one another.”
But practically no testing for and indeed very little research on synergistic effects is done. EPA establishes “safe” levels for new pesticides one by one without regard to their possible interactions with other products already in use.
How good is the assumption that EPA’s regulation of pesticides indeed effectively ensures the safety of pesticides? Can you guess?
EPA’s regulation is deeply flawed. It is charged with making decisions on the basis of a “cost-benefit” analysis where health and safety are but one factor.
Costs arising from hazards to human health are weighed against economic benefits to conventional growers from higher yields or reduced production costs. And there are so many pesticides to judge even by these questionable standards, that many are being used that have not been tested.
Also, “inert” ingredients are not listed or tested. Other hazards (e.g. ozone layer depletion) are ignored. Safety is determined for the average person, ignoring more vulnerable children and old timers. Further, manufacturers themselves provide safety data. Hummm.
If I were an even-tempered sort of fellow, I’d say there is reason for concern about the safety of pesticides.
Author: James Eisenstein
Bio: Unpaid Field Hand at Jade Family Farm | Former Penn State Professor
Most recent entries
- Introducing the Blue Robot Summer 2013 Writers
- Ring in the New Year with Katie Herzig’s Latest Album, “The Waking Sleep”
- 2013 Will Be Ellie Goulding’s Year
- Penn State’s Movin’ On music festival announces MGMT as the Headliner
- Asher Roth and The White Panda Bring The Party at Alumni Hall Last Friday
- Album Review: Nicki Minaj’s Revamped Album - Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded The Re-Up
- Asher Roth and The White Panda are Bringing the Party to Penn State TONIGHT (12/7)
- ‘Tis The Season! Some Songs to Put You in the Holiday Spirit
- The Party Girl Is Back: Ke$ha’s Latest Single, “Die Young”
- Album Review: Delilah’s Debut Album “From The Roots Up”
- More Music to Discover Over the Holiday: Flight Facilities
- Album Review: Matt & Kim Release Thunderous New Album, “Lightning”
- Marina and the Diamonds’ Latest Single Gives a Guide To Breaking Hearts
- The UK’s Latest and Greatest: Emeli Sandé
- Springsteen and his E Street Band Rocked The BJC
- Stephen Smith
- Alexandra Voigt
- Chelsea Sweithelm
- Nathan Etter
- Charlee Redman
- Natalie Plumb
- John Hendrickson
- Michael Giannelli
- Carly Mallenbaum
- Ryan Chase
- Pat Baxter
- Marcus Correll
- Aaron Wynne
- Mike Hobson
- Samantha Hatfield
- Brian McFarland
- Lindsay Carolla
- Johnny Chadwick
- Devin Weakland
- Ryan Kappy
- Stephanie Williams
- Christopher Will
- David Porter Callanan
- Matt D'Ippolito
- Karen Marchuska
- Rachel Garman
- Brittany Barth
- Mike Moynahan